Revenue Must Reflect User Value

Sign in to use AI Summary.

A lot of early-stage founders choose a revenue model the same way they choose a domain name; fast, emotional, and without much logic. If the product looks like SaaS, they pick subscription. If it touches businesses, they call it B2B. If it sits between two groups, they assume B2B2C. And before long, pricing becomes guesswork instead of strategy.

I learned this the hard way during my early Founder Institute Lagos sessions while working on Referlytics . I had multiple user types like creators, businesses, agencies and each one had a different pain point and a different willingness to pay. I kept asking myself, “Which revenue model makes the most sense?” My mentor said something that changed everything:

“You’re not pricing the product. You’re pricing the value. And you must charge the people who have the most to gain and the most capacity to keep paying.”

That single line forced me to rethink my entire approach. Because the truth is simple: A revenue model isn’t a label. It’s a reflection of where value sits and who benefits most from it.

And this is where many startups struggle, especially in Africa.

Why revenue models fail in African markets

African markets are dynamic, price-sensitive, and shaped by a unique mix of purchasing power, FX instability, and trust gaps. A model that works in the US can collapse in Nigeria, Kenya, or Ghana simply because the economics are different.

Three things complicate pricing in Africa:

• FX distortion

• Low and inconsistent purchasing power

• Segment misalignment

This is why foreign tools suddenly feel “too pricey” here, even when they are cheap in their home markets. Not because the tools are bad, but because the revenue model wasn’t designed for our context.

And this issue isn’t new.

Every major entertainment platform from Spotify, Netflix to Showmax has had to subsidize pricing across Africa at some point. Even with subsidies, renewal rates stay unstable. When Netflix increased its subscription price recently, many users paused, downgraded, or exited. I personally had to check how often my family used it to justify the plan.

But here’s where it gets interesting.

Those same users who struggle to renew subscriptions don’t mind paying several times for one-off value when the need arises. A ₦1,200 pay-per-use tool might earn more from the same user in six months than a ₦3,500 monthly subscription they can’t sustain.

This is a signal founders must not ignore.

Is Africa quietly shifting away from subscriptions?

It’s a fair question. And the data points are consistent:

• Subscriptions renew only when the value is felt every month.

• Pay-per-use aligns with irregular income cycles.

• Commission models feel fairer because users pay only when value happens.

• Pay-as-you-go removes the psychological pressure of “ongoing commitment.”

From ride-hailing to airtime purchases to cloud software, the African user behaves like a value-maximizer, not a commitment-maximizer.

This doesn’t mean subscriptions are dead. It means subscriptions must match real usage, not founder imagination.

As pricing strategist Patrick Campbell once said:

Recommended by LinkedIn

The Return of Outbound: Why Q1 Is the Time to Double…

The Sales Experts Ltd

5 months ago

Spotify buys a (third) podcast, consumer sentiment…

LinkedIn Daily Rundown (US)

7 years ago

The Pattern Behind Every Massively Successful Consumer…

Hoda Mehr

2 months ago

“Your price should reflect the moment value is delivered, not the moment you wish value was delivered.”

And in Africa, value moments are not monthly, they are situational.

What founders get wrong about revenue models

Pricing is not revenue modeling. Revenue modeling is not just choosing “subscription” or “commission.”

Your revenue model shapes:

• Your pricing strategy

• Your market entry strategy

• Your customer acquisition cost

• Your retention curve

• Your unit economics

• Your ability to survive economic shocks

I’ve consulted for many startups in Africa, and I’ve seen brilliant products fail, not because of poor UX or weak distribution, but because their revenue model didn’t match user behavior or economic reality.

As Harvard Business School puts it:

“A business model is a company’s core logic for making money. Pricing is how that logic meets the market.”

If your logic does not match the market, your pricing cannot save you.

So how should founders think about revenue models?

Ask five fundamental questions:

• Who gets the highest value from your product?

• Who has the capacity to keep paying consistently?

• Which pricing model aligns with user reality?

• Is your model stable under FX fluctuations and income shocks?

• Does your model allow you to experiment without losing trust?

When you design your revenue model from value not vibes, everything downstream becomes clearer.

The key takeaway here is

Some products fail because they are bad. But many fail because their revenue model was built on assumption, not economics.

In markets like Africa, where demand is high but purchasing power is unstable, product teams must match pricing with context, not theory.

So ask yourself today:

Is your revenue model built on user reality or guesswork?

Don't forget to comment and share with someone that needs to know this, especially my fellow founders.

Rate this article