True Agile

Sign in to use AI Summary.

Seven months.

That’s how long it took me to figure out the simplest, leanest, and most effective version of Referlytics—an idea I’d been obsessed with for a year plus now. Well, take it that I was distracted and wasn't really focusing on it but I was sure I could do better at it.

And no, it wasn’t because I lacked clarity on the vision. I had the big picture. The problem? I was trying to build the full vision instead of the core proof because I was super inspired by what it means to the market when it finally comes alive.

Like many founders, I overthought what an MVP should be, believing what I envisioned was lean enough when it wasn't. I thought I needed a fully represented dev team but nah I only needed just a few guys to ride with me on it. A scalable backend. Perfect UX. A marketing strategy. But what I really needed was just this:

A version of the product that helps me validate assumptions, test behavior, and learn fast—with the least effort and cost possible.

That’s the real definition of being agile. Not moving fast and breaking things—but moving smart, small, and strategic.

MVPs Have Become Monsters

Let’s be honest—MVPs are broken.

What was supposed to be minimal is now misunderstood. For many, building an MVP now means:

• Hiring a dev team

• Raising funds

• Building dashboards, onboarding, settings, notifications, exclusive support…

• Burning 6 months before even talking to users

It’s no longer about validation. It’s about execution before clarity. And that’s dangerous.

As Reid Hoffman famously said:

“If you're not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you've launched too late.”

But how many early-stage startups have launched anything at all?

The Real Problem: Teams, Tools, and Overthinking

In reality, most budding founders face three hard truths:

• Resource constraints – You don’t have time or money to waste.

• Lack of the right team – Without alignment and belief in the vision, teams drift. Some join for distraction. Others bail quietly when it gets tough.

• Overbuilding too early – You pour effort into features users haven’t asked for.

But here’s the good news:

With today’s tools—especially AI, no-code, and automation—you can validate faster than ever without a full team or funding round.

Let’s talk about how.

3 Practical Ways to Validate Your Product Without Overbuilding

1. Manual First: Solve the Problem Without Code

If you can’t simulate your solution manually, you’re probably unclear on the core problem.

Let’s say you want to build a tool that connects brands with micro-influencers. Before building anything, ask: What’s the most optimized manual way I can deliver this value?

• Use Google Sheets to match influencers to brands

• Send curated PDF reports via email

• Ask users for feedback on accuracy and usefulness

This manual MVP forces you to interact with users, refine your assumptions, and gather insights—without writing a single line of code.

Principle: If the value doesn’t exist in the manual version, it won’t magically appear in the software.

2. Automate with Third-Party Tools

Not every MVP needs custom code. Ask yourself: Can I stitch together third-party tools to deliver 50–70% of the experience?

Example stack:

• Typeform or Tally for data collection

• Airtable for logic and storage

• Zapier for automation

• Notion for delivery

Recommended by LinkedIn

🔦Shedding Light on the Black Box

Juan C.

11 months ago

AGILE DECODED | Chapter-4: The Pivot

Manoj Agarwal

8 years ago

Key principles of experimentation and why we need it…

Anastasiya Kelput

4 years ago

You’ll be surprised how far you can go.

In fact, I’ve seen early-stage founders make their first $5K revenue using this method. Once users confirm value, then you invest in engineering.

“Don’t scale what isn’t working. Don’t automate what you haven’t tested.” – JT, from a startup workshop I ran last year.

3. Build the Diversion Version (Shadow MVP)

Sometimes the best MVP is a diversion—a limited but focused version of your product that simulates core value.

This was my turning point with Referlytics.

Instead of building a full analytics engine, I asked:

• Can I generate a simplified influencer profile with data from publicly available tools?

• Can I use GPT-4 to summarize content performance?

• Can I present a basic shareable profile users can engage with?

The answer was yes. It wasn’t perfect—but it was real, testable, and insightful.

This “shadow version” helped me:

• Get user feedback on what mattered most

• Drive early traction and referrals

• Build a waitlist of users who already saw value

Lesson: If users aren’t excited about the simplified version, they won’t care about the full one either.

The Team Equation: Vision > Roles

Let’s talk about the team piece for a second.

Startups often fail not because the idea sucks—but because the team lacks alignment, vision and drive. At the early stage, you need people who believe before they build, not people who wants to build another cool stuff they can add to their portfolio.

“It takes a great team to build a great product. But it takes a shared vision to keep that team aligned when things get messy.”

I’ve seen founders chase rockstar devs and growth hackers—only to discover that talent without alignment is a liability.

When I was struggling to nail Referlytics' first version, I had no full-stack team. Just enough people who believed in the journey and trusted the iterative process. That’s all you really need.

My Journey with Referlytics

Started out as an hobby project, became so glue to it that it kept me up every other night and I began working on it with all my free time. I was reluctant to push a waitlist at first. Why? Because I didn’t want passive emails—I wanted engaged users giving feedback.

I told myself (and the startups I consult for): “If you’re going to ask for attention, give people something to interact with. Let them shape the journey with you.”

Once I leaned into that approach, things changed:

• We stopped building in the dark

• We started learning from real behavior

• We began building with users, not for them

Yes, Referlytics Beta is coming soon...

If You're a Founder or Product Manager, Here's My Ask:

• Start smaller than you think you should.

• Don’t wait for perfect conditions.

• Test in public. Iterate with real users.

The real MVP is clarity.

Clarity of value, of audience, of behavior. And that only comes from doing the hard, messy work of thinking lean, acting fast, and listening close.

You don’t need 12 features. You need one transformative functionality.

Build that. Then evolve.

And if this sparked a new way of thinking, repost, forward it to a fellow PM or Founder. Stay sharp. Stay strategic. Subscribe to Product Slice with JT.

Rate this article