← All build notes
AIBuildingArchitecture

What Broke When I Rebuilt Three Products With AI

A first-hand account of the exact failure pattern AI-assisted building creates when speed outruns architecture — and what it actually looks like when a fix in one place starts breaking two unrelated things.

There is a specific kind of failure that only shows up when you are moving fast with AI tools, and I hit it during my Lovable era, rebuilding three different products back to back.

Nothing was wrong on day one. The first few features came together fast, faster than I was used to. Prompt, generate, ship, repeat. But past the impressive demo stage, the backend started getting heavy. Not slow heavy. Tangled heavy. The logic under each new feature was not sitting next to clean, isolated pieces anymore. It was reaching into things I had built two features ago, sometimes without either of us, me or the AI, fully tracking that it had happened.

By the time I noticed, it was not one thing breaking. It was one thing breaking, and then two more things breaking because I fixed the first one. Fix the payment flow, the onboarding state goes wrong. Fix onboarding, a completely unrelated report stops generating. Nothing about those three things should have been connected. But they were, because the architecture underneath had turned into a pile of implicit dependencies instead of a system with boundaries.

I have since seen the exact same pattern from the other side, on a project I am working on now, watching a developer fix one bug and two others pop up somewhere else. I could tell immediately what was happening, because I have been there. That is not bad luck and it is not a bad developer. It is a signal. When a fix in one place reliably breaks something unrelated, the problem was never really the bug. The bug was just the first crack to show. The real problem is the system has no boundaries left, and every fix is now a blind edit into a web you cannot fully see.

Here is what I take from it now. AI assisted building removes friction on writing code, but it does nothing for you architecturally unless you are deliberately keeping structure, clear modules, clear ownership of state, clear boundaries between features, as you go. Speed without structure does not fail slowly. It fails all at once, later, expensively, and it looks like chaos even though the actual cause was a series of small, individually reasonable shortcuts.

If you are building fast with AI right now and things feel like they are getting heavy, trust that feeling. It is not you being slow. It is the system telling you it is time to stop and draw some boundaries before you keep going.

☆ Favorite